Sujaritlak Deepadung, Sumittra Suraratdecha, Narong
Ardsamiti,
Pichet Setaphong
Research Institute for
Languages and Cultures of Asia, Mahidol
University, Thailand
<lcsdp@mahidol.ac.th>, <lcssm@mahidol.ac.th>, <lcnas@mahidol.ac.th>, <lcpst@mahidol.ac.th>
Language vitality and
language attitude of Mon ethnic group in the western region of Thailand:
Preliminary Report
This paper presents preliminary findings of the
research project entitled “Ethnicity Language Culture and Ethnic Tourism
Development.” The initial attempt is to locate Mon ethnic groups residing in
the western region of Thailand.
A questionnaire is devised for a data collection on Mon inhabited areas. Based
on the collected data, a linguistic map of areas inhabited by Mon, overlapped
with multiple layers of linguistic and cultural information of Mon, is
presented. The linguistic map shows that Mon ethnic groups reside in eight
provinces of the western region, namely, Kanchanaburi, Ratchaburi,
Nakornpathom, Phetchaburi, Prachuapkhirikhan, Suphanburi, Sumutsakhon and
Samutsongkhram. A preliminary survey of the language attitudes and language use
of Mon people in these eight provinces was carried out using a qualitative
approach. Two kinds of guided questionnaires were constructed for data
collection, i.e., community and personal questionnaires. Key persons living in
each Mon community were interviewed using the guided questionnaires. The
interviewed subjects include local administrators and community leaders.
The interviews yield
preliminary findings on the language use and attitudes of Mon people in eight
provinces. The Mons, who came to Thailand during
mid Ayudhaya and early Rattanakosin period are Thai citizens and are found in
Ratchaburi, Nakornpathom, Phetchaburi, Suphanburi, Sumutsakhon and
Samutsongkhram. Mons
in Ratchaburi and Nakornpathom show strong vitality in using the Mon language
in everyday life while those in the other four provinces show the least
language vitality. Advanced age Mon people in all six provinces still speak
Mon; 50% of the adults can speak Mon but don’t use it in daily life because of
their working environment. Children and teenagers can understand Mon but don’t
use it anymore. Language attitudes among adults and advanced age people are
positive - they wish their children could speak Mon.
Those who came after 1948
C.E. (2491 B.E.), are mostly non Thai citizens. They are found in Ban Wang Ka
village in Kanchanaburi and in Ban Huaykriap village in Prachuapkhirikhan. All
the Mons found
in these two villages use Mon in their daily lives, so the language vitality is
at a maximum. Their language attitudes are very positive, while those at Ban
Wang Ka have already introduced the Mon language and wisdom into schools, those
at Ban Huaykriap would like to have schools that teach Mon. Mons at Wang Ka
believe that ethnic tourism will be good for their community; tourism can bring
some bad things but strong community will save their ethnic identity and their
language.
Based on these preliminary
findings, a quantitative method, combined with participant observations, will
be applied to the Mon language use and attitude data. Finally, the data
analysis will be followed by a participatory action research (PAR).